Do you see giant reed (Arundo) as a promising source of green energy or a
threat to Oregon’s environment? It is your turn to weigh in. Public comments
are now being accepted on the Oregon Department of Agriculture's (ODA) proposed regulation for Arundo. We need your
input to get this right because what happens in Oregon over the next few years
could impact the state for decades, even centuries to come. In fact, it could
have worldwide ramifications. This is a big deal.
Portland General Electric (PGE) is
proposing to use giant reed as a replacement fuel for their Boardman power plant
after 2020 when coal is no longer an option. It is an interesting idea. From a
green, sustainable energy point of view, it’s a winner. Arundo grows fast and
produces as much as twenty tons of biomass/acre/year. That’s attractive if
you’re in the biofuel business, but there is a potential down side. Arundo is also
a serious noxious weed. In fact, it is considered one of the worst invasive
species worldwide.
ODA is
walking a tightrope. We’d love to see a source of homegrown, carbon-neutral
energy, but we’d hate to be complicit in the introduction of a new noxious weed.
So we’re proposing a regulation to allow biofuel production while minimizing the
risk of escape. Here is a summary of what the regulation would do:
- Allow Arundo for biofuel
under permit.
- Prohibit Arundo in floodplains.
- Growers/companies would pay
a $2.00/acre/year assessment to cover the cost of monitoring.
- A $100/acre bond, up to $1
million, would be required to cover eradication, if needed.
- Wild-type Arundo would be phased out
of the nursery industry. Variegated varieties would be allowed unless the State
Weed Board declares Arundo a noxious weed.
Theoretically
there should be a zone outside Arundo’s potential range where you can grow it with
irrigation, fertilizer, and suppression of competition, but it won’t thrive and
spread on it’s own. The evidence available today suggests Boardman is in that
zone. Much of the rest of Oregon might be also. Riparian areas would be the
exception.
The success
or failure of this project for PGE is likely to hinge on economics and the
availability of irrigated land. We wish them well and hope that our proposed
regulations are not a significant impediment. ODA’s bottom line is to keep Arundo
from becoming a noxious weed.
If this experiment works, Arundo would be an excellent complement to wind energy, and Oregon would
be taking a huge step toward the use of clean, renewable energy. If Arundo doesn’t
pan out and hasn’t become a weed -- oh well, it was worth a try. The only scenario
we need to avoid is that it escapes and invades our riparian areas. Working
together, we should be able to prevent that from happening. Help us get this
right.
Check out the proposed rules at: http://www.oregon.gov/ODA/PLANT/Pages/index.aspx. Let us know if you think they would do what we need to protect Oregon. Comments can be submitted via email to: sgooch@oda.state.or.us until November 9, or you can come to one of the hearings and present your testimony in person (Oct. 30, 11:00 AM in Salem or Oct. 31, 4:00 PM in Hermiston). Or just post your comments below. We’re listening.
Dan Hilburn
I realize this post is quite old, but can that bond amount realistically cover the cost of Arundo control when it's been evaluated at $25,000 per acre in California? See this article for more information: http://www.cal-ipc.org/ip/research/arundo/8CostBenefitAnalysis.pdf
ReplyDelete