Showing posts with label juniper. Show all posts
Showing posts with label juniper. Show all posts

Friday, February 28, 2014

60 Grants and 3 Odd Weeds

The most recent Oregon State Weed Board meeting was notable for two reasons. 

1. There were a large number of high-priority grant applications.
The Board considered 86 applications and was able to fund 60 for a total of $1,370,000. The funded projects targeted weeds which have small infestations and  containment or local eradication is possible. The Board skipped over “hole-in-the doughnut” projects that would treat small areas in a larger sea of weeds and "treadmill" projects that would only suppress weeds temporarily.

2. The second notable part of the agenda came during consideration of species to add to the State’s official noxious weed list.
Typically, the Board considers non-native invaders that are spreading in Oregon or knocking on our door. Oregon Dept. of Agriculture (ODA) staff assess the risk of these invaders and recommend to the Weed Board those weeds that are likely to cause economic or environmental harm. Currently, the Weed Board lists 118 weeds and divides them into “A” “B” and “T” categories.

A Weeds

  • These are the worst threats and are targeted for eradication or containment. There's a good chance you've never seen A weeds, which include:  kudzu, Paterson’s curse, and purple starthistle. 
  • All known infestations of these weeds are under intensive control. 
  • If you do see an “A” weed, we’d like to know about it (1-866-INVADER). 

B Weeds

  • B weeds are “A” weeds that get out-of-hand. There's a good chance you've seen B weeds, which include:  blackberries, Scotch broom and yellow starthistle. 
  • Abundant regionally or even statewide, suppressing their grown is the best we can do. 
  • Many “B” weeds are targets for biological control.

“T” weeds 

  • T weeds are "Targeted" weeds. The Weed board directs ODA Noxious Weed Program staff to pay attention to these.
  • T weeds include all A weeds and some B’s that haven’t spread throughout their potential range.

What to do with 3 odd balls? 

Ribbon grass, cheat grass, and Western juniper didn’t fit the usual pattern when they came before the Board.

Ribbon Grass

Ribbon grass is a pretty horticultural variety of reed canary grass, Phalaris arundinacea. There is an infestation along the Metolius River starting at Camp Sherman and spreading downstream along the banks for a couple of miles. I’ve written about it before (post Aug. 24, 2011).
Reed canary grass itself is both a wetland weed and a valuable forage species. The challenge for the Weed Board was how to handle a unique local weed issue in an otherwise pristine habitat involving a horticultural variety of a widespread, sometimes-weedy, forage grass!
After an interesting discussion, the Board voted to list ribbon grass as both “B” and “T.”
The management plan for ribbon grass will focus on the banks of the Metolius. Treatments will start this fall. Hopefully, we can clean up the infestation and preserve one of Oregon’s most scenic spots for future generations of fly-fisherman, photographers, and visitors.

Cheat Grass 

Cheat grass isn’t pretty and it has annoying seeds that stick to your socks. It is well-adapted to dry habitats and it has been spreading in the West for over a century. Cheat grass is important ecologically because it shortens fire cycles. When cheat grass moves in, rangeland burns more frequently, and that is bad for sagebrush. Sage-grouse and other native species hat depend on sagebrush decline. Next year the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service will consider whether or not to list sage-grouse as a threatened species. Thus there is renewed attention on cheat grass.
It would seem to be a no-brainer to list cheat grass as a noxious weed, but, as was pointed out at the Board meeting, it is also an important forage species where little else will grow.
In the end, the Board decided not to list it but instructed staff to come up with an official policy recognizing that cheat grass can be a problem and keeping it out of important sage grouse habitat should be a priority.

 Western Juniper

The Board took a similar path with Western juniper, a native tree that is spreading like a weed (post June 1, 2013). Juniper encroachment is another reason sage grouse are declining and ironically, fire suppression favors juniper. Soon Oregon will have an official policy recognizing juniper encroachment as a problem. Hopefully that will encourage juniper removal from invaded habitats. It is unlikely that the Board would ever approve a grant for juniper removal by itself, but I expect we’ll see projects that include survey and treatment for cheat grass and other weeds that can move in after disturbances including juniper removal.

It is all related – nature is complicated!


-- post written by Dan Hilburn









Saturday, June 1, 2013

What to do with Western Juniper?

Juniper encroaching on sage brush habitat in Oregon.
         Not all invaders are aliens. Western juniper, Juniperus occidentalis, is invading grassland habitats in central and eastern Oregon. This native species doesn’t fit our official definition of an invasive species—“nonnative organisms that cause economic or environmental harm” (ORS 570.755) —but it is sure acting like one.

         Between 1936 and 1988, the area of juniper forest in eastern Oregon increased 5.3 times from 420,000 to 2,200,000 acres.* The reason for this slow but steady invasion is that we’ve changed the way grasslands are managed. Native Americans used to set fire to the grasslands to keep them open. Not any more. We do our best to suppress fires because they threaten houses, livestock, and other things we care about.

         Unfortunately, we’ve created a juniper invasion. Encroaching juniper is degrading sage grouse and other wildlife habitat, shading out native grasses, sucking up ground water, and creating opportunities for invasions of weeds and other undesirable species. The state has convened a large task force to look for solutions. It’s called the Western Juniper Working Group (WJUG), and I’m the representative from the Oregon Department of Agriculture (ODA).

         I’m learning fast that it is complex issue. Some people on the WJUG would like ODA to declare Western juniper a noxious weed. We’re not going to do that. It is a native species, and thus has a place in Oregon ecosystems. However, the expansion of juniper is a problem, and if some sort of official recognition would help focus attention on it, we should consider our options. I’m looking forward to the discussion at the next State Weed Board meeting.

         Reintroducing fire as a management tool would seem to be a no-brainer, but there are serious liability questions. Currently, if your controlled burn gets out of control, you’re liable for fire suppression costs and damages.

         Most juniper suppression projects today are cut, pile, and burn. It is laborious, costly, and not popular with some members of the public.

         The ideal solution would be to find economic uses for juniper so there would be an incentive to log the trees. There are two challenges to that idea. One is that junipers occur in areas where there aren’t many mills and markets. Thus, costs to transport harvested wood to places where it can be processed are generally prohibitive. Secondly, compared to other trees in Oregon, junipers are short and gnarly. Juniper just doesn’t compete with Douglas fir, Ponderosa pine, and other conifers in terms of producing a suite of desirable wood products.

         Juniper does make interesting rustic furniture, but it’s a niche market. You’ll find it at a gallery in Sisters, Oregon, but not at J.C. Penny. I have a coffee table with twisted juniper legs that I like, but it’s not for everyone.

         Juniper is superior to all other woods in one way. It makes great fence posts that don’t rot. OSU has fence post trials that go back to the 20s and 30s. The juniper heartwood fence posts from way back then are still standing! I’ve never seen juniper posts for sale in the building supply stores I frequent, but that is probably because no one asks for it, and it would be more expensive. Maybe we can start a movement to encourage people to ask for local juniper instead of using treated wood posts and landscape timbers. I’d pay more if I knew it was good for the environment and would last longer, wouldn’t you?

         We need a good slogan. How about:
  • Got juniper?
  • Juniper, the other fence post.
  • Fence the invader! 

Help me out here. What would you recommend?

Dan Hilburn

*Gedney, D.R., D.L. Azuma, C.L. Bolsinger, and N. McKay. 1999. Western Juniper in      Eastern Oregon. USDA, Forest Service, Gen. Tech. Report PNW-GTR-464.     53pp.